Interior Department Significantly Expands Hunting and Fishing Access Across National Wildlife Refuges
The U.S. Department of the Interior has implemented a significant expansion of hunting and fishing access, making over 92 million acres, or 95% of the National Wildlife Refuge System lands across 32 states, available for these activities. This expansion includes…
South Bend Elkhart, IN, September 4, 2026 — The U.S. Department of the Interior has announced a broad expansion of recreational hunting and fishing opportunities, making more than 92 million acres of land within the National Wildlife Refuge System accessible for these activities. This represents 95% of the system’s total acreage across 32 states.
The initiative introduces new possibilities for hunting and fishing in areas where such activities were previously restricted or prohibited. Concurrently, the department has reversed a planned phase-out of lead ammunition and fishing tackle, and has undertaken efforts to simplify existing regulations related to these pursuits. The number of refuge units open to hunting and fishing has increased significantly as a result of this expansion.
This decision has been met with differing perspectives. Sporting organizations have generally voiced support, highlighting potential economic benefits and emphasizing the historical contributions of hunters and anglers to conservation efforts. They view expanded access as a means to foster greater public engagement with natural resources.
Conversely, some conservation groups have expressed reservations. These concerns primarily revolve around the potential compatibility of increased public access, particularly with the use of lead ammunition and tackle, with the core wildlife conservation mandates of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Questions have also been raised regarding the department’s capacity to ensure adequate oversight and resource management under the expanded access policies.
Details regarding specific new areas opened for hunting and fishing, or the precise timelines for regulation simplification, were not elaborated upon in the summary provided. Similarly, the specific conservation mandates and oversight capacities that are subjects of concern for some groups were not detailed.
Story summarized from the original created by Rebecca Schneid on time.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
